Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Shimray, Somipam R.
- Use of Internet through Mobile Devices:A Survey
Abstract Views :255 |
PDF Views:8
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet – 605014, Puducherry, IN
2 School of Media & Communication, Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet – 605014, Puducherry, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet – 605014, Puducherry, IN
2 School of Media & Communication, Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet – 605014, Puducherry, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 100-105Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the use of Internet through mobile devices. This study was conducted using a questionnaire. Findings reveal that most of the respondents admit the importance of the Internet in their day-to-day life. Over three fourths (79%) of them have access to the Internet on their mobiles and majority (84.8%) preferred accessing Internet at home.Keywords
Internet, Library Use, Mobile Phones.
References
- Castells, M., Fernández-Ardèvol, M., Qiu, J. L., and Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4692.001.0001
- Cotten, S. R., Anderson, W. A., and Tufekci, Z. (2009). Old wine in a new technology, or a different type of digital divide? New Media and Society, 11(7), 1163–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342056
- Ericsson. (2014). Ericsson mobility report. Retrieved from https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/news/2014/11/ericsson-mobility-report-november-2014.pdf.
- Haddon, L., and Kim, S. D. (2007). Mobile phones and webbased social networking - emerging practices in Korea with Cyworld. Journal of Communications and Networks, 6(1), 5-12.
- Hargittai, E. (2010). Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “Net Generation”. Sociological Inquiry, 80(1), 92–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
- Hargittai, E., and Kim, S. J. (2010). The prevalence of smartphone use among a wired group of young adults. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University.
- Hasebrink, U., Görzig, A., Haddon, L., Kalmus, V., and Livingstone, S. (2011). Patterns of risk and safety online: In-depth analyses from the EU Kids Online survey of 9- to 16-year-olds and their parents in 25 European countries. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14682885.2012.01416.x
- Lien, T. (2018). More than half of households have ditched landline phones. Retrieved from https://www.vcstar.com/ story/news/2018/06/10/more-than-half-households-have-ditched-landline-phones/683659002/.
- Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
- Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Cortesi, S., and Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and Technology 2013. Washington: Pew Research Center.
- Muniandy, B. (2010). Academic use of internet among undergraduate students: A preliminary case study in a Malaysian University. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 3, 171–8.
- Pearce, K. E., and Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63, 721–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12045
- Poushter, J. (2016a). Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center.
- Poushter, J. (2016b). Smartphone ownership rates skyrocket in many emerging economies, but digital divide remains. Retrieved from http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-rates-skyrocket-in-many-emerging-economies-but-digital-divide-remains/.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
- Ravichandran, S. V. (2009). Mobile phones and Teenagers: Impact, Consequences and Concerns. Auckland, New Zealand: Unitec Institute of Technology.
- Samadder, R. (2018). End of the line: our guide to the death of the telephone. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global/2018/jun/24/landline-mobile-guide-death-telephone
- Shimray, S. R., Keerti, C., and Ramaiah, C. K. (2015). An overview of mobile reading habits. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 35(5), 343–54. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.5.8901
- Srivastava, L. (2005). Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour. Behaviour and Information Technology, 24(2), 111–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290512331321910
- Vaidya, A., Pathak, V., and Vaidya, A. (2016). Mobile phone usage among youth. International Journal of Applied Research and Studies, 5(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20908/ijars.v5i3.9483
- West, J., and Mace, M. (2010). Browsing as the killer app: Explaining the rapid success of Apple’s iPhone. Telecommunications Policy, 34(5/6), 270–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2009.12.002
- Yang, H.-J., and Lay, Y.-L. (2011). Factors affecting college student’s mobile phone dependence and anxiety. World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science. San Francisco: International Association of Engineers.
- Use of YouTube by Students:A Case Study of Pondicherry University
Abstract Views :344 |
PDF Views:17
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet - 605014, Puducherry, IN
2 School of Media and Communication, Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet - 605014, Puducherry, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet - 605014, Puducherry, IN
2 School of Media and Communication, Department of Library and Information Science, Pondicherry University, Kalapet - 605014, Puducherry, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 56, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 113-121Abstract
This study examined the use of YouTube for educational purposes. An online questionnaire was designed using Google form and data were collected from Pondicherry University students. Data screening, validity and reliability were carried out before analysis with the help of SPSS software. AMOS version 22 and SPSS version 20 were used for data analysis. An independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA test reveal that there is a significant difference between age and purpose of viewing videos (p-value = 0.003), similarly between gender and learning motivated by educational videos from YouTube (p-value = 0.001) and between gender and educational outcome (p-value = 0.005). The findings of this study show that educational videos from YouTube aided the students in preparing assignments, presentations and seminars. Also, it helps them to achieve a better educational outcome.Keywords
Educational Outcome, Educational Videos, Educational use of YouTube, Motivate Learning, YouTube.References
- Huffman, W. H. and Huffman, A. H. (2012). Beyond basic study skills: The use of technology for success in college. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2):583-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.004.
- Torres-Ramírez, M., García-Domingo, B., J. Aguilera and Casa, J. D. (2014). Video-sharing educational tool applied to the teaching in renewable energy subjects. Computers and Education, 73:160-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.014.
- McCormick, J. G., Holland, S. and Szydlo, L. R. (2010). Experiential Learning 2.0 Incorporating YouTube in Leisure Studies. Schole. A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 25(1): 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.2010.11949651.
- Duverger, P. and Steffes, E. M. Using YouTube videos as a primer to affect academic content retention. Working Together Works: Partnering for progress 2012 CUMU national conference. Chattanooga: The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (UTC); 2012. p. 51-66.
- Shah, I. and Khan, M. (2015). Impact of multimedia-aided teaching on students’ academic achievement and attitude at elementary level. US-China Education Review, 5(5):349-60.https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623X/2015.05A.006.
- Aslam, S. (2018). Omnicore. Retrieved on 09 10, 2018, Available from https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtubestatistics/.
- Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2014). An examination of undergraduate student’s perceptions and predilections of the use of YouTube in the teaching and learning process. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 10: 17-32. https://doi.org/10.28945/1965.
- Moreno, R. and Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2): 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.91.2.358.
- Mayer, R. E. and Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1): 87-99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077.
- Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3):297-313. https://doi.org/10.2190/YJLG-09F9-XKAX-753D.
- Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical Education, 44(6):543-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03624.x. PMid: 20604850.
- Young, B., Hausler, J. and Sanders, J. W. (2008). Do online students exhibit different learning styles than onsite students? International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Education, 5(4).
- Alias, N., Razak, S. H., Hadad, G., Noh, N. R., Kunjambu, K. and Muniandy, P. (2013). A content analysis in the studies of YouTube in selected journals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103:10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.301.
- Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, Movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1):1-21.
- Eick, C. J. and King, D. T. (2012). Nonscience Majors’ perceptions on the use of YouTube video to support learning in an integrated science lecture. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(1):26-30.
- Tan, E. and Pearce, N. (2011). Open education videos in the classroom: Exploring the opportunities and barriers to the use of YouTube in teaching introductory sociology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19s1/7783.
- Liu, Y. (2010). Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1):101-14. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0301.08.
- Logan, R. (2012). Using YouTube in perioperative nursing education. AORN, 95(4):474-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2012.01.023. PMid: 22464620.
- Alwehaibi, H. O. (2015). The impact of using Youtube in EFL classroom on enhancing EFL students’ content learning. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 12(2): 121-26. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v12i2.9182.
- Choi, B. K. and Rhee, B. S. (2014). The influences of student engagement, institutional mission, and cooperative learning climate on the generic competency development of Korean undergraduate students. Higher Education, 67(1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9637-5.
- Alpay, E. and Gulati, S. (2010). Student-led podcasting for engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4):415-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2 010.487557.
- Jackman, W. M. and Roberts, P. (2014). Students’ perspectives on YouTube video usage as an E-resource in the university classroom. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(3):273-97. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.42.3.f.
- Fleck, B. K., Beckman, L. M., Sterns, J. L. and Hussey, H. D. (2014). YouTube in the classroom: Helpful tips and student perceptions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 14(3):21-37.
- Greenberg, A. D. and Zanetis, J. (2012). The Impact of Broadcast and Streaming Video in Education. In: Media Legislation Reports, Duxbury: Cisco Systems. http://bufvc.ac.uk/copyright-guidance/mlr/index.php/site/403.
- Miller, M. V. (2009). Integrating online multimedia into college course and classroom: With application to the social sciences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(2):395-423.
- Jaffar, A. A. (2012). YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 5(3):158-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1268. PMid: 22383096.
- Alwagait, E., Shahzad, B. and Alim, S. (2015). Impact of social media usage on students academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(Part B): 1092-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.028.
- Khalid, A.Z. and Muhammad, K. (2012). The use of YouTube in teaching english literature: The case of Al-Majma’ah Community College, Al-Majma’ah University (Case Study). International Journal of Linguistics, 4: 515-25. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i4.2930.
- Diseth, A., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A. and Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education and Training, 48(2/3):156-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910610651782.
- Choi, N. (2005). Self-Efficacy and self-concept as predictors of college students’ academic performance. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4): 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20048.
- Isaac, S. and Michael, W. (1995). Handbook in Research and Evaluation: A Collection of Principles, Methods, and Strategies useful in the Planning, Design, and Evaluation of Studies in Education and the Behavioral Sciences (3 ed.). San Diego: Edits Publication; Ill + 234 p. https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/31144409.
- Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2 ed.). New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1):31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
- Munro, B. H. (2003). Statistical Methods for Health Care Research (5 ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://jumed14.weebly.com/uploads/5/8/7/5/58753271/biostat_textbook.pdf.
- Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
- Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3):382-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313.
- Gaur, A. S. and Gaur, S. S. (2009). Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS (2 ed.). New Delhi: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9788132108306.
- Snyder, S. L. and Burke, S. C. (2008). Students’ perceptions of YouTube usage in the college classroom. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(11):11-23.
- Kabooha, R. and Elyas, T. (2015). The Impacts of using YouTube Videos on Learning Vocabulary in Saudi EFL Classrooms. Proceedings of International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation 2015. Seville: IATED Publications; p. 3525-31.
- Research Misconduct: A Comprehensive Examination of Retracted Publications in Biomedical Literature
Abstract Views :51 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science (DLIS), School of Information Science and Technology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), Lucknow - 226025, Uttar Pradesh, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science (DLIS), School of Information Science and Technology, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), Lucknow - 226025, Uttar Pradesh, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 60, No 6 (2023), Pagination: 361-370Abstract
The study aims to examine retracted articles in the biomedical literature and inspect the characteristics of retracted papers. The PubMed database was searched for retracted articles from 2012 to 2022. Four hundred twenty-one retracted articles were identified and used to examine retraction characteristics, publishers, the impact factor of retracted articles, and reasons for retraction. China published more than one-third of the retracted articles. Four authors wrote 16.86 per cent of the retracted papers. Springer has the highest retraction rate. The retraction rate has been increasing since 2012. Of 421, 364 (86.46 per cent) had an IF (Journal Citation Reports). Reasons for retraction include plagiarism, fake peer review, duplication of an article, concerns/issues about data/error in data, error in analyses, error in methods, notice-limited or no information lack of IRB/IACUC approval, concerns/issues about referencing/attributions, lack of approval from the third party, lack of approval from author and author withdrawn. These findings suggest a need for a strict and more deliberate role of editors, reviewers, institutions and governments to emphasize the importance of avoiding research wrongdoing. This study reflects the erroneous mistakes made by the academic community to get their work published.Keywords
Biomedical Literature, Journal Impact Factor, Research Misconduct, Retracted Publications, Reasons for Retraction, Retracted Papers.References
- Bhatt, B. (2021). A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences. Scientometrics, 126, 4039–4054. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-021-03907-0
- Bik, E. M., Casadevall, A., and Fang, F. C. (2016). The prevalence of inappropriate image duplication in biomedical research. mBio, 7, Article e00809-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/ mBio.00809-16 PMid:27273827 PMCid:PMC4941872
- Bozzo, A., Bali, K., Evaniew, N. and Ghert, M. (2017). Retractions in cancer research: A systematic survey. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017- 0031-1 PMid:29451549 PMCid:PMC5803635
- BMJ. (2022). Scientific misconduct. Available at: https://www. bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/forms-policiesand- checklists/scientific-misconduct
- Brainard, J. (2018). Rethinking retractions. Science, 362, 390-393. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.362.6413.390 PMid:30361352 Campos-Varela, I., Villaverde-Castañeda, R., and Ruano-Raviña, A. (2020). Retraction of publications: A study of biomedical journals retracting publications based on impact factor and journal category. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34, 430-434. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.05.008 PMid:31530483
- Chen, W., Xing, Q.-R. Wang, H. , and Wang, T. (2017). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China. Scientometrics, 144, 217–227. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-017-2565-x COPE. (2019). Retraction guidelines. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/files/ retraction-guidelines-cope.pdf
- Dal-Ré, R., and Ayuso, C. (2019). Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018. Journal of Medical Genetics, 56, 734–740. https:// doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106137 PMid:31300549 PMCid:PMC6860402
- Elango, B., Kozak, M., and Rajendran, P. (2019). Analysis of retractions in Indian science. Scientometrics, 119, 1081–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03079-y
- Elango, B. (2021). Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics, 126, 3965–3981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03895-1 PMid:33716353 PMCid:PMC7937359
- Faggion, C. M., Ware, R. S., Bakas, N., and Wasiak, J. (2018). An analysis of retractions of dental publications. Journal of Dentistry, 79, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jdent.2018.09.002 PMid:30205129
- Fang, F. C., and Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted science and the retraction index. Infection and Immunity, 79, 3855–3859. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.05661-11 PMid:21825063 PMCid:PMC3187237
- Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., and Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109 PMid:23027971 PMCid:PMC3479492
- Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4, Article e5738. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 PMid:19478950 PMCid:PMC2685008
- Grey, A., Avenell, A., and Bolland, M. (2022). Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group. Accountability in Research, 29, 347–378. https://doi.org/10.10 80/08989621.2021.1920409 PMid:33882262
- Grieneisen, M. L., and Zhang, M. (2012). A Comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLoS ONE, 7, Article e44118. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0044118 PMid:23115617 PMCid:PMC3480361
- Ho, Y.-S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science. Current Science, 107, 1565–1572.
- Lei, L., and Zhang, Y. (2018). Lack of improvement in scientific integrity: An analysis of wos retractions by Chinese researchers (1997–2016). Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7 PMid:28889329
- Liu, X., and Chen, X. (2018). Journal retractions: Some unique features of research misconduct in China. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49, 305–319. https://doi.org/10.3138/ jsp.49.3.02
- Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., Wakhlu, A., Sharma, A., Agarwal, V., and Negi, V. S. (2017). Plagiarism: A viewpoint from India. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 32, 1734–1735. https:// doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2017.32.11.1734 PMid:28960022 PMCid:PMC5639050
- Moradi, S., and Janavi, E. (2018). A scientometrics study of iranian retracted papers. Iranian Journal of Information processing and Management, 33, 1805–1824.
- Mousavi, T., and Abdollahi, M. (2020). A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences. DARU, 28, 359–369. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s40199-020-00332-1 PMid:32072484 PMCid:PMC7214560
- Moylan, E. C., and Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: A retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. British Medical Journal Open, 6, Article e012047. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-012047 PMid:27881524 PMCid:PMC5168538
- Palla, I. A., Singson, M., and Thiyagarajan, S. (2020). A comparative analysis of retracted papers in Health Sciences from China and India. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 401–416. https://doi. org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1754804 PMid:32279538
- Parasuraman, S., Raveendran, R., and Ahmed, K. M. (2015). Violation of publication ethics in manuscripts: Analysis and perspectives. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 6, 94–97. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976- 500X.155487 PMid:25969657 PMCid:PMC4419256
- Rai, R., and Sabharwal, S. (2017). Retracted publications in orthopaedics: Prevalence, characteristics, and trends. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 99, Article e44. https:// doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01116 PMid:28463926
- Ribeiro, M. D., and Vasconcelos, S. M. (2018). Retractions covered by retraction watch in the 2013-2015 period: Prevalence for the most productive countries. Scientometrics, 114, 719– 734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2621-6
- Retraction Watch Database. (2022). Retraction Watch Database User Guide Appendix B: Reasons. Retrieved on 07 15, 2022, Available at: https://retractionwatch.com/ retraction-watch-database-user-guide/retraction-watchdatabase- user-guide-appendix-b-reasons/
- Shimray, S. R. (2022). Research done wrong: A comprehensive investigation of retracted publications in COVID-19. Accountability in Research, 30, 393–406. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08989621.2021.2014327 PMid:34856823
- Wager, E., Barbour, V., Yentis, S., and Kleinert, S. (2009). Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Croatian Medical Journal, 50, 532–535. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2009.50.532 PMid:20017220 PMCid:PMC2802086
- Wang, T. Xing, Q.-R. Wang, H., and Chen, W. (2019). Retracted Publications in the Biomedical Literature from Open Access Journals. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25, 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0040-6 PMid:29516389
- Wasiak, J., Hamilton, D. G., Foroudi, F., and Faggion, C. M. (2018). Surveying retracted studies and notices within the field of radiation oncology. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 102, 660–665. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.028 PMid:29964101
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., and Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036–1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099 PMid:17431139
- Xu, S., and Hu, G. (2021). A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction. Accountability in Research, 29, 512–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621. 2021.1952870 PMid:34228942